Why the Los Angeles Dodgers Parted Ways with Cody Bellinger

Frank Jones

Updated on:

Dodgers Trade Cody Bellinger

The landscape of Major League Baseball is often defined by its “what have you done for me lately” culture.

Nowhere was this more evident than in November 2022, when the Los Angeles Dodgers made a decision that sent shockwaves through the sporting world: they officially non-tendered their former National League MVP, Cody Bellinger.

To the casual observer, letting a homegrown superstar walk for nothing seemed unfathomable. However, a deeper dive into the statistical regression, physical toll, and financial landscape reveals a calculated—albeit difficult—business decision.

This article explores the multifaceted reasons behind the Dodgers’ choice to move on from one of the most iconic figures of their recent championship era.

The MVP Peak and the Sudden Valley

To understand why the Dodgers let Bellinger go, one must first appreciate how high he had climbed.

In 2019, Cody Bellinger was the undisputed king of Los Angeles. He secured the NL MVP award after a season of pure dominance, blending elite power, gold-glove defense, and high-level baserunning.

However, the “massive drop in production” that followed was unprecedented for a player of his caliber. By the time 2022 rolled around, the Dodgers weren’t looking at an MVP; they were looking at a player who had become a “below-average hitter” according to league standards.

The Statistical Collapse: By the Numbers

The decline was not just a minor slump; it was a statistical freefall. Analytics such as wRC+ (Weighted Runs Created Plus)—where 100 is league average—tell the story:

  • 2019: 161 wRC+ (Elite, MVP level)
  • 2021: 47 wRC+ (Significantly below replacement level)
  • 2022: 83 wRC+ (Below league average)

For a franchise with World Series aspirations every single year, carrying a primary outfielder with a 47 wRC+ was a luxury the Dodgers could no longer afford, regardless of his defensive prowess.

The Injury Bug: A Cascading Effect on Mechanics

Professional athletes operate on razor-thin margins. For a hitter like Bellinger, whose swing was characterized by high velocity and complex leverage, physical health was paramount. 

The Triple Threat of Injuries

Bellinger’s body took a beating over a short period, hampering his ability to find a consistent rhythm at the plate:

  1. Shoulder Injuries: Perhaps the most infamous was the shoulder dislocation suffered during a high-five celebration in the 2020 Postseason. This required surgery and altered his swing plane.
  2. Calf Issues: Leg strength is the foundation of power hitting; a calf injury early in 2021 disrupted his timing and base.
  3. Rib Fractures: Rib injuries further complicated his ability to rotate and generate the torque necessary for his signature home run power.

These compounding physical setbacks turned a fluid, explosive swing into one that was often late on fastballs and vulnerable to breaking pitches. The Dodgers eventually concluded that the version of Bellinger they were seeing was a direct result of these lingering physical tolls.

The $18 Million Question: The Economics of Non-Tendering

In MLB, the salary arbitration process ensures that players receive raises as they gain experience, often based on their career accolades rather than just their most recent season. Because of his early-career success (including that 2019 MVP), Bellinger was slated for a massive payday.

A Question of “Sound Investment”

Heading into the 2023 season, Bellinger was expected to earn an arbitration salary of roughly $18 million or more. From a front-office perspective, the math simply didn’t add up.

  • The Dilemma: Do you pay $18 million for a player who has struggled to hit above .210 for two years?
  • The Decision: The Dodgers determined that paying that premium for a “below-average hitter” was not a “sound investment”.

By non-tendering him, the Dodgers avoided being locked into that high salary, choosing instead to use those funds to bolster other areas of the roster.

Roster Flexibility and the “Next Man Up” Philosophy

The Los Angeles Dodgers are known for their deep farm system and their ability to find “value” in versatile players. Keeping Bellinger would have occupied a consistent spot in the lineup and a significant portion of the “luxury tax” budget.

By parting ways with him, the Dodgers gained roster flexibility. This move allowed the team to:

  • Open up playing time for younger prospects or versatile veterans who could provide more consistent offensive output.
  • Free up budgetary space for other potential contributors, ensuring the team remains agile in the free-agent market.

In the high-stakes environment of the NL West, the Dodgers prioritized a balanced, high-floor lineup over the hope that a high-priced, struggling star would suddenly find his old form.

Clarifying the Departure: Trade vs. Non-Tender

It is a common misconception that Bellinger was “traded.” In reality, the Dodgers chose not to offer him a contract (non-tendered), which made him an unrestricted free agent.

A trade would have required another team to take on his projected $18 million salary while giving the Dodgers assets in return.

Given his performance at the time, few teams were willing to trade valuable prospects for the right to pay a struggling hitter $18 million. Consequently, the Dodgers opted to let him walk into free agency, allowing him to sign with any team of his choosing.

The Aftermath: A Career Revitalized

While the Dodgers’ decision was based on data and financial logic, it wasn’t the end of the road for Cody Bellinger. Sometimes, a change of scenery is exactly what a player needs to shed the weight of expectations.

Success with the Chicago Cubs

Following his release from Los Angeles, Bellinger signed with the Chicago Cubs. It was here that he managed to revitalize his career, proving that he still had the potential to be a high-impact player when healthy.

His resurgence in Chicago eventually led him to another major market, as he later joined the New York Yankees.

This post-Dodgers success suggests that while the Dodgers were right about his current value in 2022, Bellinger still possessed the work ethic and talent to reinvent himself elsewhere.

Conclusion: The Business of Baseball

The departure of Cody Bellinger from the Dodgers is a textbook example of how quickly the window of opportunity can close in professional sports. It was a perfect storm of severe offensive decline, compounding injuries, and a prohibitive price tag.

For the Dodgers, it was a move defined by salary cap efficiency and the need for roster flexibility. For Bellinger, it was a painful exit from the only professional home he had ever known, but one that paved the way for a successful second act in his career.

Ultimately, the Dodgers’ decision to part ways with their former MVP reminds fans that even in a game of “Boys of Summer,” the cold reality of the front office always has the final say.

Leave a Comment