One of the most controversial aspects of the NHL is the role of fighting in the game. While some fans and players enjoy the physicality and intensity of a good scrap, others argue that it is unnecessary, dangerous and detrimental to the sport. However, there is one type of fighting that is especially unfair and unjustified: when a player is forced to fight after making a clean hit.
A clean hit is a legal body check that does not target the head, neck or knees of an opponent, and does not involve charging, boarding, interference or any other penalty.
It is a legitimate way of separating an opponent from the puck, disrupting their play or creating a turnover. It is also a skill that requires timing, positioning and strength.
However, sometimes a clean hit can result in an angry response from the opposing team, especially if the hit was hard or on a star player. In these cases, a player who made a clean hit may be challenged to a fight by another player who wants to “stand up” for their teammate or “send a message” to the hitter. This is often seen as an unwritten rule or code of conduct in the NHL, but it is also unfair and illogical.
First of all, forcing a player to fight after making a clean hit is essentially punishing them for playing by the rules. It is like telling a player who scored a goal that they have to fight someone because they were too good. It makes no sense and contradicts the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship.
Secondly, forcing a player to fight after making a clean hit can put them at risk of injury or suspension. Fighting can result in concussions, broken bones, cuts, bruises or worse.
It can also lead to penalties such as instigator, misconduct or game misconduct, which can affect the outcome of the game or the standings. Moreover, it can lead to fines or suspensions from the league, which can hurt the player’s career and income.
Thirdly, forcing a player to fight after making a clean hit can discourage them from playing their game or using their skills. A player who is afraid of retaliation may hesitate to make a clean hit or avoid contact altogether.
This can reduce their effectiveness and impact on the ice. It can also take away from their enjoyment and passion for the game.
Therefore, NHL players who are forced to fight after making a clean hit should not face any penalties from the league or their opponents. They should be allowed to play their game and use their skills without fear of retribution.
Fighting should be reserved for situations where there is mutual consent or genuine animosity, not for enforcing an arbitrary and outdated code of conduct. This would make the game safer, fairer and more exciting for everyone involved.
Final Thoughts: Fighting After Clean Hit in NHL
The issue of fighting in the NHL has long been debated, with some arguing that it adds excitement and physicality to the game, while others consider it unnecessary and even dangerous. However, when a player is forced to fight after making a clean hit, the debate takes on a new dimension.
Forcing a player to fight after making a clean hit is essentially punishing them for playing by the rules, which goes against the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship. It can also put them at risk of injury or suspension, and discourage them from using their skills and playing their game effectively.
Furthermore, the unwritten rule or code of conduct that encourages fighting after a clean hit is arbitrary and outdated. It is not necessary for enforcing discipline or respect among players, and it can lead to unfair penalties and game outcomes.
In conclusion, NHL players who are forced to fight after making a clean hit should not face penalties from the league or their opponents. The focus should be on fair play, sportsmanship, and player safety, and fighting should only be allowed in situations where there is mutual consent or genuine animosity. By doing so, the game would be safer, fairer, and more exciting for everyone involved.
