Twitter Blue is a new subscription service that offers users a range of features, including the ability to edit tweets, access exclusive content, and keep their verified blue checkmark. However, not everyone is willing to pay $8 a month for these perks, especially some of the biggest sports stars in the world. One of them is Patrick Mahomes, the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback and two-time Super Bowl champion. Mahomes has a massive following on Twitter, with over 2.4 million fans who tune in to his updates on and off the field. But he doesn’t seem to care about losing his verification status, which is supposed to indicate that he is the real Patrick Mahomes and not an impostor. Mahomes made his stance clear when he replied to a tweet from his teammate Marquez Valdes-Scantling, who urged him to sign up for Twitter Blue and “pay the $8 for the guys.” Mahomes responded with a hilarious excuse: “Can’t bro I got kids…” Mahomes was obviously joking, as he is one of the highest-paid athletes in the world, with a 10-year contract worth $503 million. He also recently welcomed his second child with his wife Brittany Matthews, so he can certainly afford to spend $8 a month on Twitter. But he apparently doesn’t see the value in doing so, and he’s not alone. Other sports superstars who have expressed their opposition to Twitter Blue include LeBron James, who tweeted “Welp guess my blue [check] will be gone soon cause if you know me I ain’t paying the 5.” James is also one of the richest athletes in the world, with a net worth of $1 billion, but he doesn’t want to pay for something that he used to get for free. Twitter Blue is part of Twitter CEO Elon Musk’s strategy to boost the revenue and growth of the social media platform, which he acquired for $44 billion in 2022. Musk has said that Twitter Blue will offer users a better experience and more control over their online presence. But he has also faced backlash from users who feel that he is taking away something that they earned or deserved. The verification process on Twitter has been controversial for years, as many users have complained about the lack of transparency and consistency in how Twitter decides who gets verified and who doesn’t. Some users have also accused Twitter of being biased or unfair in its verification policies, favoring certain groups or individuals over others. Twitter Blue is supposed to solve these issues by allowing users to pay for their verification, as well as other benefits. But it also risks alienating some of its most popular and influential users, who may not want to pay for something that they see as a status symbol or a right. And if these users leave or lose their verification, it could also affect their followers and fans, who may feel less connected or engaged with them. Twitter Blue is set to launch on April 1, 2023, and it remains to be seen how many users will sign up for it and how many will opt out. But one thing is clear: Patrick Mahomes won’t be getting Twitter Blue anytime soon, unless he changes his mind or his kids convince him otherwise. Final Thoughts: Twitter Blue and the Price of Verification Twitter Blue is a new subscription service that promises a better experience and more control over one’s online presence. However, the service also offers something that was once free and highly coveted: the blue checkmark of verification. Now, users will have to pay $8 a month to keep their verification status, along with other features like the ability to edit tweets and access exclusive content. This move has sparked a debate among users, especially among sports superstars who have expressed their opposition to Twitter Blue. For many of these athletes, the $8 monthly fee may seem like a small price to pay, given their massive wealth and influence. But for others, it’s a matter of principle or a reflection of the evolving nature of social media and its value to individuals and society. On the one hand, Twitter Blue may be seen as a smart business move by CEO Elon Musk, who is trying to boost the revenue and growth of the platform. By charging for verification and other features, Musk is creating a new revenue stream for Twitter, which has struggled to monetize its user base in recent years. He is also giving users more control over their online presence and a way to differentiate themselves from impostors and trolls. On the other hand, Twitter Blue may be seen as a betrayal of the values that Twitter once stood for, such as openness, transparency, and democracy. By charging for verification, Twitter is creating a two-tiered system of users, where those who can afford to pay are more privileged and protected than those who can’t. This may lead to a further divide and distrust among users, who may feel that Twitter is no longer a level playing field or a safe space for free expression and engagement. Moreover, Twitter Blue may be seen as a reflection of the larger trend of platform capitalism, where social media companies extract value from users without adequately compensating them or protecting their rights. By monetizing verification and other features, Twitter is profiting from the attention and data of its users, without fully acknowledging their contributions or addressing their concerns. In conclusion, Twitter Blue is a complex and controversial issue that raises many questions about the future of social media and its role in society. While it may offer some benefits to users, such as more control over their online presence and a way to distinguish themselves from impostors and trolls, it also risks creating new inequalities and conflicts among users, especially among those who can’t afford to pay for verification and other features. Ultimately, the success of Twitter Blue will depend on how well it balances the needs and interests of its users, its investors, and its values as a public platform for free expression and engagement.