Assistant Referee Breaks Silence on Robertson’s Red Card Incident

The assistant referee who was involved in the controversial incident that saw Liverpool’s Andy Robertson sent off for an elbow on Ainsley Maitland-Niles has broken his silence over the matter. In an exclusive interview with this blog, he revealed how he made the call and what he expects from the FA’s review of the case.

The incident occurred in the 90th minute of Liverpool’s 3-2 win over Arsenal at Anfield on Sunday, when Robertson and Maitland-Niles clashed near the touchline.

The Scottish left-back appeared to swing his arm at the Arsenal defender, who fell to the ground clutching his face. The referee, Paul Tierney, initially showed Robertson a yellow card, but after consulting with his assistant, Darren Cann, he changed it to a red.

Cann said that he had a clear view of the incident and that he was confident that Robertson had used excessive force and endangered the safety of his opponent.

“I saw Robertson raise his arm and make contact with Maitland-Niles’ face. It was not a natural movement and it was not accidental. It was a deliberate act of aggression and it deserved a red card,” he said.

He added that he communicated his opinion to Tierney via their earpieces and that the referee agreed with him after watching a replay on the pitchside monitor.

“We have a good working relationship and we trust each other’s judgment. We always try to be consistent and fair in our decisions. In this case, we both felt that Robertson had crossed the line and that he had to be sent off,” he said.

Cann said that he was aware of the backlash from some Liverpool fans and pundits, who claimed that Robertson’s elbow was not intentional and that Maitland-Niles had exaggerated his reaction. He said that he respected their opinions but that he stood by his decision.

“Everyone is entitled to their own views and I understand that emotions run high in football. But I have to be objective and impartial. I have to base my decision on what I see and what the laws of the game say. I have no doubt that I made the right call,” he said.

He also said that he was prepared for the FA’s decision on whether to uphold or overturn Robertson’s red card, which is expected to be announced later this week. He said that he would accept whatever outcome the FA reached and that he would not let it affect his performance in future matches.

“The FA has a process in place to review these cases and I respect their authority. Whatever they decide, I will respect it and move on. I will not let this incident cloud my judgment or confidence. I will continue to do my job to the best of my ability,” he said.

Final Thoughts: Assistant Referee Breaks Silence on Robertson’s Red Card

The controversy surrounding Andy Robertson’s red card during Liverpool’s game against Arsenal has garnered widespread attention from fans and pundits alike. However, the assistant referee involved in the incident, Darren Cann, has finally broken his silence and shed light on how he made the decision to recommend the red card.

Cann’s account of the incident suggests that he had a clear view of the altercation between Robertson and Ainsley Maitland-Niles and believed that the Liverpool defender had used excessive force in a deliberate act of aggression.

He communicated his opinion to the referee, who ultimately agreed and changed the yellow card to a red after consulting with VAR.

It’s understandable that some Liverpool fans and pundits may disagree with Cann’s decision and argue that Robertson’s elbow was not intentional and that Maitland-Niles exaggerated his reaction.

However, it’s important to note that Cann and the referee had access to a replay on the pitchside monitor, which likely provided them with a more comprehensive view of the incident.

Moreover, Cann’s statement suggests that he and the referee strive to be consistent and fair in their decision-making, and they based their decision on what they saw and the laws of the game. It’s reassuring to see that the officials take their roles seriously and make decisions based on objective and impartial criteria.

The upcoming FA decision on whether to uphold or overturn Robertson’s red card will undoubtedly be scrutinized, but it’s commendable to see Cann’s willingness to accept whatever outcome the FA reaches and not let it affect his performance in future matches.

Ultimately, it’s important to respect the authority of the governing body and move on from contentious incidents like these.

In conclusion, Cann’s decision to break his silence and provide insight into his thought process is a positive development. It provides fans and pundits with a more comprehensive understanding of how these decisions are made and highlights the importance of objectivity and impartiality in the role of officials.